Park Place Securities, Inc.
Every Foreclosure by Caliber Home Loans is a FRAUD

We recently looked into Caliber Home Loans and the scummy trusts that they service and we were shocked at what we found. Virtually every foreclosure is based upon fraud and forgery. Not only can we prove it, we can show you how to prove it in court.

If you have a loan serviced by Caliber Home Loans involving a loan in a trust of which U.S. Bank Trust N.A. is the trustee, your foreclosure was done using outright fraud and forgery. We can prove it. If you have already lost your home you can get it back. If you are in a deed of trust state you can stop the sale. We tell you exactly how to do this and reveal information not even foreclosure defense lawyers seem to have discovered.

In 2008 the ecomony nearly collapsed due to REMIC trusts which were proven to be a Ponzi scheme by Wall Street.

Virtually every foreclosure involving REMIC trusts involves fraud. All trusts are based on contracts and REMIC trusts are based on a contract called a Pooling and Servicing Agreement (PSA). Virtually everyone involved in a REMIC has violated the PSA. Notes were never endorsed so Servicers manufacture mortgage assignments and Powers of Attorney to give themselves standing to foreclose. They ignore basic trust law, i.e. ONLY the Depositor can deposit anything into the trust. But the lessons that should have been learned by 2008 are again being ignored by a new type of scammer.

Now there is a relatively new type of trust being used in a very similar way called a DST or Delaware Statutory Trust. Companies such as Lone Star Funding are buying up defaulted home loans from the FHA and others, then placing them into Delaware Statutory Trusts. If your property is in a trust named LSF followed by a number such as LSF9, that is a Lone Star Fund trust. Caliber Home Loans services these trusts, and although they could probably foreclose legally, it is much easier, cheaper and faster to use the same dirty illegal tricks used by the REMIC trusts.

Our special report will let you put a stop to it.

Special Report is available soon.

Court Case Report

April 7, 2017 U.S. District Court

The United States District Court for the Northern District of New York recently denied plaintiff bank’s motion for default judgment in a foreclosure action and dismissed the complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, finding that plaintiff failed to sufficiently allege the existence of diversity of citizenship to establish subject matter jurisdiction. See U.S. Bank Trust, N.A. v. Monroe, 2017 WL 923326 (N.D.N.Y. March 8, 2017).

In the case, plaintiff filed its complaint in federal court, alleging nonpayment of a mortgage by defendant and asserting subject matter jurisdiction based on diversity of citizenship. Plaintiff, a national bank, alleged that it is a citizen of Delaware based on having a principal place of business in Delaware and that defendant is a citizen of New York. Plaintiff brought the action on behalf of a Master Participation Trust, for which plaintiff bank serves as trustee. Defendant failed to appear in the action and the Clerk of the Court noted his default. Plaintiff subsequently moved for default judgment. The Court denied the motion on multiple grounds.

First, it found that plaintiff’s allegation about its principal place of business was insufficient to establish diversity, and noted that the Second Circuit has expressly held that the principal place of business is not to be considered when determining the citizenship of a national banking association. See OneWest Bank, N.A. v. Melina, 827 F.3d 214, 218–21 (2d Cir. 2016) (holding that a national bank is only a citizen of the state designated by its articles of association as the location of its main office). Plaintiff’s failure to provide the location of its main office meant that it had failed to properly allege its own citizenship.

Second, the Court held that plaintiff was only the nominal plaintiff in the action because it brought the complaint on behalf of a trust, and that the trust’s citizenship controls for diversity purposes. Plaintiff failed to include any allegations concerning the type of trust at issue, plaintiff’s degree of control over the trust assets, or, alternatively, the citizenships of the trust’s beneficiaries, all of which would be necessary to determine the trust’s citizenship. While the Court allowed plaintiff leave to file a motion to amend its complaint to address these deficiencies, it was harshly critical of plaintiff’s counsel for not clearly setting forth plaintiff’s basis for diversity jurisdiction.

Florida Caliber Case - Allonges/Failure of Proof/Lost Note -- ROBELTO Appellants, v. U.S. BANK TRUST, N.A., AS TRUSTEE FOR LSF8 MASTER PARTICIPATION TRUST, Appellee. No. 4D14-4721[May 4, 2016]

Contact Information:
Dan F. Schramm, CEO
Park Place Securities, Inc.
2011 Flagler Avenue
Key West, FL 33040

Email: dan@blueplanetoffices.com

Office: 305-570-1188

Urgent Matters- Dan Schramm, CEO direct: 305-394-3439

 Home  Policy & Privacy  News Letter Signup  Comments  Blue Planet Offices Home Page   More Options